A level head is only as good as an open mind
Radio waves have been proven to effect electron precipitation, a known depletion mechanism of stratospheric ozone, for nearly 30 years! It can also be seen in the global temperature graph from when broadcast first began in 1909. They have satellite observations of direct heating high above areas of major broadcast activity as well as an increase in lightning activity and lightning induced electron precipitation. Power line harmonic radiation has also been observed in magnetospheric electron precipitation.
Too few are aware of the increasing danger
The IPCC never mentioned radio pollution as an option because nobody knew
Everything in nature has a frequency, and 1.45MHz is the natural frequency of the ionosphere. This frequency is known as the cyclotron or gyro frequency due to the gyro motion of the electrons as they spiral forward instead of looping along magnetic fields lines. Because the ionosphere is close to the gyro frequency it is sensitive to stimulation from AM broadcast (520MHz - 1,610MHz). So when we transmit radio waves in the gyro frequency range, it transfers this electromagnetic energy into the ionosphere stimulating the gyro motion of electrons and causing the propagation of plasma waves along earths magnetic field lines in electron density ducts leading to the north pole. The broadcast/plasma wave energy (--) flows along this wave guide and amplifies as it nears the polar cusp region causing runaway particle out flows of ions (+) and electrons(--) that rain down increasing the formation of NO2. Broadcast television uses a frequency that has been shown to suppress the ion acoustic turbulence disrupting the path of the gyro energy. This buffers the gyro energy and partially calms the electron precipitation and the ozone depletion process. All this gyro energy depletes our ozone...our most important defense against the sun.
Gyrofrequency and sun - the cause is one and the same
When AM broadcast first began in 1909, the effects of broadcast and electron precipitation may have had little effect before the broadcast boom in 1920. When AM really took off, the energy sent through the ionosphere caused electron precipitation and the production of NO2 to deplete the ozone layer in the northern polar region causing the temperature to rise through the greenhouse effect. This took place up until the mid 40's when television came on which clamped the energy flow and allowed the electron precipitation to calm. As the ozone layer repaired it' self in the north the temperature dropped back down for five years until the early 50's when the interaction between ozone depletion and creation found equilibrium. Yet along with electron outflows came ions that flow up the 'closed' magnetic field lines connecting the magnetosphere to the conjugate hemisphere and up the 'open' magnetic lines where it takes 11-12 years or so for the O+ ion particles to reach the sun where it injects as O+ ion gas into the convective region where electrons are eager to equalize any imbalance in polarity. This in turn forms sunspots and throws more solar particles back at earth causing a SPE (Solar Proton Event) which also depletes ozone. The rise and fall of the sunspot cycle can be seen to follow the same rise and fall in temperature ending in the late 50's just 11 years earlier, because the cause is one and the same. This gyro energy is observed heating particles in the solar wind and boiling the photosphere of the sun. If AM broadcast had no effect on the sun, you would have been likely to see a flat line from the early 50's to the mid 70's when FM radio came over the airwaves.
The Final Rise
As FM came over the airwaves it filled the frequency gap between AM 1.5MHz and Television which increases the electron density in the ionosphere. The increase of electron density creates an electrical path allowing the gyro energy a conductive bridge to the F layer of the ionosphere were it flows over any block of the ion acoustic turbulence. And because we can see the link between ozone depletion and the temperature it narrows it down to broadcast (electron precipitation), CFC's or solar variance. Of these 3 ozone depletion mechanisms only broadcast continues to rise unregulated for it's effects on the environment. And although our global temperature is not much higher than the Medieval Warm Period, because it is man made it is no less dangerous. Unless we stop the root of the cause, it may continue. The reason why it has caused so much debate is because climate scientists knew little about the effects of broadcast on the environment. While scientists argue from a perspective they study and know, the complexity of this process crosses scientific disciplines, making it difficult to see how they all fit together.
Why haven't we noticed this before?
Electron precipitation has been observed as a constant flow of energy that trickles down from the ionosphere since the 70's, and has been thought of as an unknown 'natural' ozone depletion mechanism, but to this day nobody knows for sure what causes electron precipitation. Keep in mind that 'unknown' and 'natural' are two different things, 'natural' implies that we know nature is causing it, while unknown means we have no idea. With the transmitter experiments in the 80's scientists realized that radio waves could stimulate electron precipitation. Because all of our measurements of electron precipitation had been conducted in the thick of radio pollution, which has been nonstop since1909 when AM stations first came over the airwaves, a few scientists began to speculate that broadcast may play a role in anomalous electron precipitation, a phenomena previously thought of as natural. You can 'google' and find lots of scientific research about how radio waves can cause electron precipitation, and you can find lots of research about how electron precipitation can increase atmospheric NO2 which depletes ozone, but you find very little that makes the larger connection. The Swedish Institute for Space Physics and other atmospheric physicists have raised concerns about the role that global broadcast plays on the climate, but nothing has made it through to the media or the scientific community. So for decades text books have been written and sold as science based its development on the assumption that electron precipitation is ‘natural’ and the assumption that broadcast is not powerful enough to affect the thermal structure of the lower atmosphere. This ‘hiccup’ in scientific knowledge occurred because the dissemination of knowledge is slow between disciplines on a global scale, due to the process of the scientific community, where funding is competitive and political. Since the beginning of time new and great ideas have been cast aside for the familiar. Great minds like Nicola Tesla who gave us electricity or Galileo who said that the earth revolves around the sun were brilliant people who were persecuted for being ahead of their time. One would think the scientific community would see a good or promising idea and latch onto it, but often the opposite happens -- because it upsets careers or it competes with the interests of others. Scientists tend to know their niches but not make connections outside them and the proprietary nature of knowledge through funding slows interdisciplinary collaboration and realization. It takes time and money to create and replace text books and train the teachers of tomorrow. This does not discount good verifiable scientists and projects. After all we are all learning here and we don’t know everything, these things take time.
for more in depth look see the:
...and this is Broadcast Theory
for more in depth look see the:
The Theory - AM broadcast 1.45MHz causes ozone depletion and drives climate change
Radio Frequency Effects on the Ionosphere
Radio Frequency Effects in the Solar Region
Did you find this helpful?
What would you do?
Broadcast Theory follows a complex path of energy from the transmitter to ozone depletion and the greenhouse effect.
The balance of ozone and the greenhouse effect
Ozone depletion describes two distinct, but related observations: a slow, steady decline of about 4 percent per decade in the total amount of ozone in Earth's stratosphere since around 1980; and a much larger, but seasonal decrease in stratospheric ozone over Earth's polar regions during the same period. The latter phenomenon is commonly referred to as the ozone hole. As the ozone layer becomes thinner it blocks less and less solar radiation allowing this solar energy to heat ocean water and influence the disassociation of atmospheric water into vapor. The increase in water vapor then acts as a greenhouse gas and is heated by the increase solar radiation. Water vapor is the most abundant of all greenhouse gasses in the global greenhouse effect. Polar ice caps have been melting below the ozone holes and although scientists observe ocean levels rising around the globe, since the 70's Arctic ocean levels have actually been dropping due to evaporation and salinity.
Ozone's dependence on electronegativity (+/--) makes it sensitive to electrons that rain down from the ionosphere (mostly) and magnetosphere. This electron precipitation flows as rivers and streams of electrons and ions through the ionosphere in complex pathways leading to the polar and equatorial regions. Here it reacts with nitrogen forming NO2, which depletes ozone. In the 80's researchers used scientific transmitters to study the ionosphere by zapping it with radio waves. They found that zapping the ionosphere stimulated electron precipitation, this ozone depletion mechanism. To put things in perspective, the total amount of energy these scientific transmitters puts into the atmosphere are insignificant compared to the power broadcast into the atmosphere by the telecom, radio, television industry, yet are of the same types and powers. The earth's atmosphere is becoming electrically imbalanced as most of the broadcast energy is in the northern hemisphere. This electromagnetic energy changes the disassociation rates of water molecules in the water cycle leading to cloud formation and water vapor, one of the most abundant sources of heat in the global greenhouse effect. The TEC Total Electron Content of the northern polar cap has increased dramatically, and right next to it the Arctic ice is melting. The hydrology and all the atmospheric water vapor is moving moving south causing Antarctica to gain ice.